Too Much Medicine: Exploring the Relevance of the Philosophy of Medicine to Medical Research and Practice
Too Much Medicine: Exploring the Relevance of the Philosophy of Medicine to Medical Research and Practice
University of Oxford (UK)
Philosophers of medicine
Professor Alexander Bird (Bristol, UK)
Professor Lisa Schwartz and Professor Steve Woloshin (Dartmouth, US) [TO BE CONFIRMED]
Professor Ben Djulbegovic (Florida, US)
Dr. Jeffrey Aronson (Oxford)
Call for Papers
This cross-disciplinary conference will explore the emerging problem of ‘too much medicine’ (TMM) including overdiagnosis and overtreatment. TMM is likely to benefit from an interdisciplinary perspective for several reasons. One cause of TMM is arguably ‘disease mongering’ where for example risk factors are interpreted as diseases and treated as such. This is related to the philosophical problem of defining disease—without a clear definition of what counts as diabetes or cancer, harmful and costly tests and treatments can be introduced unchecked. Also, the problem of TMM provides a platform for broader issues. For example it highlights the importance of considering values alongside evidence—some might value being given a test even without an improved clinical outcome. The conference seeks to address the problem of TMM issue from an interdisciplinary perspective, especially the interface between medicine and philosophy. Papers engaging with philosophical aspects of the Too Much Medicine question are invited, with potential topics including: the role of evidence based medicine in the Too Much Medicine question, the values underlying the problem, and unique aspects of the problem in particular branches of medicine. See website for more details: https://philmedlab.wordpress.com/2016/11/28/first-blog-post/).
Selected papers from the conference in a special issue of the Journal for Applied Philosophy.
How to submit an abstract
We welcome abstracts from philosophers of medicine with ideas that may be relevant to medicine, and medical researchers/practitioners with ideas that may be relevant to philosophy are encouraged to submit abstracts.
Abstracts (no more than 200 words) to be sent no later than 28 February 2017 to: firstname.lastname@example.org. Do not include your name on the document to permit blinded review. Please be sure to emphasize the interdisciplinary nature of your talk
How to register if you would like to attend without giving a talk
The cost of the conference is £50 for two days and includes all talks, morning/afternoon tea and coffee, and lunch.
Please reserve your place by sending an email to: email@example.com no later than 28 February 2017.
Two £200 bursaries are available for UK students (including graduate students)
Professor Alexander Bird (Bristol)
Dr. Jeremy Howick (Oxford)
Professor Havi Carel (Bristol)
Professor Alexander Broadbent (Johannesburg)
Dr. Ashley Graham Kennedy (Florida Atlantic)
Dr. Sean Valles (Michigan State)
Dr. Raffaella Campaner (Bologna)
Professor Ben Djulbegovic (University of South Florida)
Ms. Charlotte Albury (Oxford)
Dr. Andrew Papanikitas (Oxford)
Dr. Andrew Moscropp (Oxford)
Professor Jeffrey Aronson (Oxford)
And in an advisory capacity:
Professor Edward Harcourt (Oxford).
Sven Bernecker and Bennett Holman are hosting the Cologne Medical Epistemology Workshop October 18th from 11:30-18:30
This is a one day workshop that will be held at the University of Cologne, Main Building, BT4 3rd Floor room 4.202 The workshop brings together a number of scholars to present their latest work in medical epistemology. All are welcome to attend.
Bennett Holman (Yonsei University (Seoul, South Korea))
Philosophers on Drugs
Lara Keuck (Humboldt-Universität Berlin)
Blurred Boundaries in Medicine
Saana Jukola (Universität Bielefeld)
On Communal safeguards for objectivity and public trust: The case of research on sugar and health
Helmut Kiene (Universität Witten/Herdecke),
Single Case Causality Assessment in Medical Treatment
Cristina Amoretti (University of Genoa),
What Kind of Evidence for Evidence Based Medicine
Self-knowledge has always played a role in health care since a person needs to be able to accurately assess her body or behaviour in order to determine whether to seek medical help. But more recently it has come to play a larger role, as health care has moved from a more paternalistic model to one where the patient is expected to take charge of her health; as we realized that early detection, and hence self-examination, can play a crucial role in outcomes; as medical science improves and makes more terminal illnesses into chronic conditions requiring self-management; as genetic testing makes it possible to have more information about our futures; and with the advent of personal electronic devices that make it easy for a person to gather accurate real-time information about her body.
It can be hard to get good information about oneself, and even harder to know what to do it. Sometimes self-knowledge is needed for a good outcome, but sometimes it is useless, or worse. Breast self-examination can lead to over-treatment, learning that one has a predisposing gene can create a detrimental illusion of knowing more about the future than one does, and data about one’s vital signs can be meaningless if taken out of a context of interpretation. We look at how these and other issues play out in a variety of medical contexts.
Venue: Greenwood Lecture Theatre & Harris Lecture Theatre (Hodgkin Building), Guy’s Campus, King’s College London.
Time: From Tuesday 03 May 2016 09:00 to Wednesday 04 May 2016 17:00.
Event on Facebook:
Event on PhilEvents:
Tuesday 3 May 2016 09:00-17:30 – Greenwood Lecture Theatre
– Tony David, IoPPN, King’s College London:
Self-reflection in illness and health – literal and metaphorical?
– Nick Shea, King’s College London:
Metacognition for acting and deciding together
– Fiona Johnson, University College London:
Self-Perception of weight: Is a little knowledge a dangerous thing?
– Matthew Hotopf, IoPPN, King’s College London:
Big data, Big Brother and the internet of things: the challenges of implementing mobile health
– Paul Norman, Universtity of Sheffield:
Psychological aspects of Breast Self-examination
– Quassim Cassam, University of Warwick:
Self-knowledge in diagnosis and self-diagnosis
– Fiona Cowdell and Judith Dyson, University of Hull:
– Reception, all in attendance are welcome
Wednesday 4 May 2016 09:00-17:00 – Harris Lecture Theatre, Hodgkin Building
– Christine Patch, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospitals:
Genetic screening: tales from the real world
– Sherri Roush, King’s College London:
Hypochondria and self-re-calibration
– Sacha Golob, King’s College London:
Self-cultivation and self-knowing: knowledge as style
– Veronika Williams, University of Oxford:
“I just know” – experiences of self-managing acute exacerbations in COPD
– Havi Carel, University of Bristol:
Self-knowledge in illness
– Tim Holt, University of Oxford:
Sailing close to the wind: models and metaphors for the self-management of diabetes
For programme updates please visit:
The event is free and open to the public. No advance booking required.
CALL FOR PAPERS The newly launched interdisciplinary journal Palgrave Communications will publish a special issue based on the symposium. The content of the publication will not be limited to the content of the symposium, but is open to all. We therefore warmly invite all researchers working on the topic of the symposium to submit their articles to be considered for publication in this special issue. Please, see the official Call for Papers for further information:
The event is hosted by Philosophy & Medicine, a joint venture between King’s Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, and The Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery with generous support from the Peter Sowerby Foundation. Find more to do at:
Date: Thursday – Friday 15 – 16 October 2015
Venue: Dunmore Lang College, Macquarie University
Time: 09:00 – 17:00
A two-day multi-disciplinary conference will be held at Macquarie University, Sydney, on October 15-16, 2015. This conference brings together scholars in the philosophy of medicine together with practicing clinicians in discussing just where, and why, the boundaries of disease should be set.
Wendy Rogers (Macquarie University)
Mary Walker (Macquarie University)
Wendy Craig (Department of Surgery, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary)
Jenny Doust (Centre for Research in Evidence-based Practice, Bond University)
Wendy Rogers (Philosophy Department and Australian School of Advanced Medicine, Macquarie University)
Thomas Schramme (Department of Philosophy, University of Hamburg)
Mary Walker (Philosophy Department, Macquarie University)
Questions relating to what should and should not be counted as disease, and where exactly the boundary between disease and non-disease should lie, are critical to the provision of appropriate health care. However, these questions have become increasingly complex with changes in medical knowledge and diagnostic technologies. The distinction between risk factor and disease has become blurred; common diseases have been redefined expansively (e.g. type 2 diabetes or chronic kidney disease); and sophisticated diagnostic tests now detect abnormalities which may or may not have pathological implications.
Responding to these questions requires engaging with medical and scientific knowledge and with the philosophical literature on disease definition. But these are not merely interesting academic questions: there are serious practical implications to setting disease boundaries. Where is the ‘right’ place for these boundaries, such that patients receive appropriate treatments to avoid excess morbidity and mortality, while avoiding the harms of overdiagnosis and overtreatment?
PROVISIONAL Program (As of 17 Sept):
Thursday 15 October:
09:15 – 10:45 : Welcome and introduction
10:45 – 10:45 : Thomas Schramme, “Delineating disease from a naturalist point of view.”
10:45 – 11:15 : Morning tea
11:15 – 12:15 : Wendy Rogers and Mary Rogers, “The line drawing problem.”
12:15 – 13:15 : Rachel Ankeny, “Geneticisation in the OMIM: Distinguishing Disease from Variation.”
13:15 – 14:00 : Lunch
14:00 – 14:45 : Jenny Doust, “When should we agree to changes to disease boundaries?”
14:45 – 15:30 : Lynette Reid, “Truth or spin? Disease definition in cancer screening.”
15:30 – 16:00 : Afternoon tea
16:00 – 16:45 : Wendy Craig, “Thyroid Cancer: an opportunity to redefine disease.”
18:30 : Conference dinner
Friday 16 October:
09:00 – 10:00 : Patrick McGivern and Sarah Sorial, “Harm and Disease.”
10:00 – 11:00 : John Mathewson and Paul Griffiths, “Boundaries from biology.”
11:00 – 11:30 : Morning tea
11:30 – 12:30 : Stacy Carter and Chris Degeling, “A negotiated, sociotechnical, outcomes-oriented approach to diagnosing health-related conditions
12:30 – 13:30 : Lunch
13:30 – 15:00 : Panel: “Implications of the boundary issue in five research areas:
Lanei Alexander (Obesity)
Yves Aquino (Asian cosmetic surgery)
Nikki Coleman (lyme disease)
Harry Schone (fibromyalgia)
Anke Snoek (addiction)
15:00 – 15:30 : Afternoon tea
15:30 – 16:30 : Summary and closing comments
Program for download [PDF KB]
Abstracts [PDF 87KB]
Contact: Mary Walker
“Taking Pregnancy Seriously in Metaphysics II: Identity and Persistence”
18 September, University of Southampton, UK.
SPEAKERS & TITLES
Lynne Baker (Amherst): ‘A Puzzle about Pregnancy: first there is one person, then there are two.’
Ellen Clarke (Oxford): ‘Reproduction and Evolution’
Elselijn Kingma (Southampton): ‘Budding Humans? Pregnancy & Identity’
Steinvor Arnadottir (Stirling): ‘On the Metaphysical Implications of the Part-Whole View.
Although philosophers have explored metaphysical questions related to pregnancy – most obviously abortion and the metaphysical status of the fetus – little philosophical attention has been paid to pregnancy itself. That is a remarkable omission because pregnancy raises important philosophical problems in metaphysics, ethics and epistemology: should the foetus be regarded as part of or ‘merely surrounded by’ the mother? If persons can be parts of other persons, what does this imply for bodily ownership and personal and numerical identity? What special rights and duties does the unique status of pregnancy bestow? Does the radically transformative character of pregnancy mean that those who have never been pregnant are excluded from certain kinds of knowledge about pregnancy and its consequences? This workshop explores the implications of pregnancy for personal identity and personal ontology.
This workshop is one of a series of four in the project Taking Pregnancy Seriously in Metaphysics, Ethics & Epistemology, funded by the Southampton Ethics Centre and the University of Southampton ‘Adventures in Research’ Scheme, with added support from the British Society for Philosophy of Science and the Aristotelian Society. It is preceded by another workshops on Metaphysics, on ‘the foetus and the maternal organism’ on the 21st of Julyhttp://www.southampton.ac.uk/philosophy/news/events/2015/07/21-the-foetus-and-the-maternal-organism.page?, and, prior to that, two workshops on Ethics and Epistemology on the 18th of June 2014 and the 13th of April 2015. http://www.southampton.ac.uk/philosophy/research/projects/taking-pregnancy-seriously.page#events
Registration is free of charge, and will include tea/coffee/refreshments. Delegates must provide/ pay for their own meals; there is an option to sign up for a buffet lunch (cost: GBP 8.50) when registering via the online store:http://go.soton.ac.uk/6go
Please register by September 10th. If you would like to attend but childcare duties render your attendance difficult, please contact the organisers (as far in advance as possible).
For more information, program, accessibility information & registration: http://www.southampton.ac.uk/philosophy/news/events/2015/09/18-identity-and-persistence.page
Submission deadline: Friday, 29th January 2016
The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice (JECP) is calling for submissions in any area of the philosophy of medicine and health care for a special edition to be published in 2016.
The philosophy of medicine has grown as an area of research to encompass questions about evidence, values (and the relationship between them), clinical judgment, health policy, public health, and preventive medicine.
We particularly welcome work that examines the implications of developments in computer-aided medical practice, including the impact of algorithmic approaches to clinical reasoning, as well as the philosophical dimensions of the “hollowing out” phenomenon of cognition, whereby some are arguing that computers will be replacing much of the factual and reasoning dimensions of clinical care and robotics increasingly displacing surgical skills.
We also welcome responses to papers published in previous thematic editions (16:2, 17:5, 18:5, 19:3, 20:6. 21:3), in line with the ethos of encouraging on-going critical debate that has generated so many enlightening exchanges in the pages of the journal. But we are just as keen to receive contributions in entirely new areas of this expanding field, representing excellent examples of the application of philosophy to questions of substantive import in medicine and healthcare.
The JECP is an international health sciences journal (Impact Factor 1.52) that focuses on the evaluation and development of clinical practice in medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. It has a large and diverse readership including practitioners and academics from a vast range of areas, and a twenty-year tradition of publishing papers raising epistemological, metaphysical and ethical issues underlying clinical policy and practice. Since 2010, its annual special issues in the philosophy of medicine have stimulated debate on numerous topics, via a combination of original papers, commissioned responses and conference reports. Themes covered have included the nature of causation and explanation in medicine, causal inference, epidemiology, values-based practice, evidence-based medicine, person-centred care, psychiatric diagnosis and practice, medical phenomenology, narrative explanation, casuistry, probabilistic and clinical reasoning, as well as fundamental debates in medical epistemology.
Manuscripts can be submitted online using the link http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/jecp – please mark the submissions clearly with the words “Philosophy thematic issue”.
The deadline for submission of manuscripts is Friday, 29th January 2016. Original papers are usually no more than 5000 words in length, and detailed author guidelines are available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2753/homepage/ForAuthors.html
Informal enquiries: please contact Jonathan Fuller (firstname.lastname@example.org).